Organization
Amnesty International
Human rights organization that reported on Bhopal in 2004 and 2014.
- Wikidata
- Q42970
What it disputes
-
Investigation of Large-Magnitude Incidents: Bhopal as a Case Study
UCC has refused to name the employee and has not produced any specific evidence in court regarding sabotage.
1
Each side is quoted in its own words. Whether a finding holds is not decided here.
Connections 3
disputes a finding of
- Investigation of Large-Magnitude Incidents: Bhopal as a Case Study 29 Nov 2004 According to Amnesty International Scholarship & press 1
authored
- Clouds of Injustice: Bhopal Disaster 20 Years On 29 Nov 2004 Scholarship & press 1
- The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors 17 Feb 2014 Scholarship & press 2
Timeline 3 dates
- 29 Nov 2004 Amnesty International disputes a finding of Investigation of Large-Magnitude Incidents: Bhopal as a Case Study According to Amnesty International
- 29 Nov 2004 Amnesty International authored Clouds of Injustice: Bhopal Disaster 20 Years On
- 17 Feb 2014 Amnesty International authored The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors
Proof 2 sources
-
Clouds of Injustice: Bhopal Disaster 20 Years On, Amnesty International, 29 Nov 2004.
Scholarship & press
UCC has refused to name the employee and has not produced any specific evidence in court regarding sabotage.
The sabotage theory has been challenged by many, including workers from the factory and testimony by UCC managers themselves.
Clouds of injustice: Bhopal disaster 20 years on
-
The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors (written statement to the UN Human Rights Council, ASA 20/003/2014), Amnesty International, 17 Feb 2014.
Scholarship & press
The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.