Work
CRS report R44864 on PDUFA VI
Congressional Research Service report with a table of fees as a share of the FDA's human drugs budget.
- Dates
- 8 Jun 2017
Connections 1
author
- Congressional Research Service 8 Jun 2017 Primary record 1
Timeline 2 dates
- 8 Jun 2017 CRS report R44864 on PDUFA VI
- 8 Jun 2017 Congressional Research Service authored CRS report R44864 on PDUFA VI
Proof 1 source
-
Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA): 2017 Reauthorization as PDUFA VI (R44864), Congressional Research Service, 8 Jun 2017.
Primary record
In the first year of PDUFA contributions to the FDA budget, user fee revenue accounted for 9.7% of the Human Drugs total program level. By FY2016, user fee revenue increased to 64.7% of the Human Drugs program
this includes revenue from PDUFA, generic drug user fees, biosimilar user fees, and outsourcing facility fees.
FDA, industry groups, and many Members of Congress generally see PDUFA and the other human medical product user fees as must-pass legislation.
The general view is that PDUFA has succeeded. FDA has added review staff and reduced its review times.
For decades, FDA had asked Congress for permission to implement user fees.
Industry, consumer groups, and FDA agreed that the time from submission of a drug or biologics application to FDA's decision was unacceptably long.
In the late 1980s, the median time for FDA to approve a new drug application (NDA) was 29 months.
could be the difference between life and death
During negotiations with industry, FDA must hold monthly discussions with patient and consumer advocacy groups
Minutes of all negotiation meetings between FDA and industry are required to be posted on the FDA website.
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.