Organization

The Dow Chemical Company

U.S. chemical company; bought all of Union Carbide Corporation’s shares in February 2001.

9 links, 5 backed by primary records. 15 more in open data

Play the story Explore connections

Also known as
Dow, TDCC
Wikidata
Q855639
Over time
  1. produced Agent Orange 1965–1970
How each side tells it

Connections 9

settled with

  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York 7 May 1984 $180M, paid with six other makers into a $180 million class settlement with Vietnam veterans and their families; the agreement is no admission of liability by the defendants and no concession of lack of merit by the plaintiffs Primary record 1

    The $180 million was the total paid by the seven makers together, not this company’s share.

acquired

  • Union Carbide Corporation Feb 2001 Scholarship & press 234

    Dow says Union Carbide stayed a separate company and Dow took on none of its liabilities; Amnesty International disputes that Dow has no responsibility to see Union Carbide in court.

produced

involved in

Timeline 3 dates
  1. 1965–1970 The Dow Chemical Company produced Agent Orange
  2. 7 May 1984 The Dow Chemical Company settled with U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  3. Feb 2001 The Dow Chemical Company acquired Union Carbide Corporation
Proof 9 sources
  1. In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 597 F. Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), MDL No. 381, decided 25 September 1984, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York (Chief Judge Jack B. Weinstein), 25 Sep 1984. Primary record Archived copy
    defendants have agreed to pay to the class $180 million plus interest in a manner directed by the court.
    Neither this Agreement nor any proceeding taken hereunder shall be construed as or deemed to be evidence or an admission or concession by any defendant of any liability or wrongdoing whatsoever, which is expressly denied by each defendant
    or on the part of the plaintiffs of any lack of merit in their claims.
    The seven chemical company defendants, Dow Chemical Co., Hercules, Inc., The Monsanto Company, Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Corporation, Thompson Chemical Corporation, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition, and Uniroyal, Inc., manufactured over 99% of a herbicide called Agent Orange
    The Fund shall indemnify all defendants
    rendered against any of them in all state-court actions alleging harm caused by exposure to Agent Orange in or near Vietnam, not to exceed an aggregate amount of $10 million.
    Dow shared this information at a meeting it called in March 1965. Representatives of Hooker Chemical, Hercules, and Diamond Shamrock (then known as Diamond Alkali) were present.
    By 1965 Dow knew that in cases of continuous exposure, dioxin could be hazardous in amounts as low as 1 ppm, which was at that time the lowest level at which dioxin could be readily detected.
    At the meeting, and on a number of subsequent occasions, Dow and other defendants expressed fear that the government, if it learned of the scope of the problem, might intervene in a way disastrous to the entire herbicide industry.
    it could be found that defendants had known for some years before Agent Orange production began in 1965 that factory workers exposed to dioxin in concentrations of tens of parts per million could develop chloracne, liver damage and other diseases.
  2. Dow & Bhopal Tragedy, The Dow Chemical Company. Self-published
    UCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of TDCC in February 2001.
  3. The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors (written statement to the UN Human Rights Council, ASA 20/003/2014), Amnesty International, 17 Feb 2014. Scholarship & press
    In 2001, UCC was bought by The Dow Chemical Company (Dow).
  4. Criminal Proceedings (Bhopal), The Dow Chemical Company. Self-published
    the 2001 transaction in which TDCC acquired UCC’s stock resulted in UCC remaining a separate corporate entity responsible for its own debts and obligations.
  5. Agent Orange, Dow Inc. (corporate.dow.com). Self-published
    During the war, Dow, Monsanto and other companies were compelled by the U.S. government to produce Agent Orange under the U.S. Defense Production Act of 1950.
  6. Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co., 517 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2008), No. 05-1953-cv, decided 22 February 2008, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 22 Feb 2008. Primary record Archived copy
    This directive essentially commandeered all of the Defendants’ capacity to produce Agent Orange.
    manufactured by defendants-appellees United States companies (collectively, “Defendants”) and deployed by the United States military during the Vietnam War.
    Defendants also argued that Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring suit, that their claims under the Alien Tort Statute were nonjusticiable under the political question doctrine, and that all of their claims were barred by the government-contractor defense.
  7. Government of India Curative Petition, The Dow Chemical Company. Self-published
    the Union of India filed a civil Curative Petition in the India Supreme Court against The Dow Chemical Company (TDCC), Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) and others.
  8. Bhopal Site Remediation, The Dow Chemical Company. Self-published
    Responsibility for the clean-up of the Bhopal site lies with the Madhya Pradesh State government.
  9. French court rejects claim in landmark Agent Orange lawsuit, Al Jazeera (with Reuters), 10 May 2021. Scholarship & press
    The landmark case, filed in 2014, has pitched Tran To Nga, a 79-year-old, who claims she was a victim of Agent Orange, against 14 firms, including US multinational companies Dow Chemical and Monsanto
Page history 1 change
  1. Add 55 stories, each checked against its sourcesAlibek96e92fe6

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.