Organization
The Dow Chemical Company
U.S. chemical company; bought all of Union Carbide Corporation’s shares in February 2001.
- Also known as
- Dow, TDCC
- Wikidata
- Q855639
- produced Agent Orange 1965–1970
According to The Dow Chemical Company
According to U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- involved in The March 1965 meeting of herbicide makers
In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation
- Settled with U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York: $180M, paid with six other makers into a $180 million class settlement with Vietnam veterans and their families; the agreement is no admission of liability by the defendants and no concession of lack of merit by the plaintiffs 1The $180 million was the total paid by the seven makers together, not this company’s share.
Connections 9
settled with
-
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
7 May 1984
$180M, paid with six other makers into a $180 million class settlement with Vietnam veterans and their families; the agreement is no admission of liability by the defendants and no concession of lack of merit by the plaintiffs
Primary record
1
The $180 million was the total paid by the seven makers together, not this company’s share.
acquired
-
Union Carbide Corporation
Feb 2001
Scholarship & press
234
Dow says Union Carbide stayed a separate company and Dow took on none of its liabilities; Amnesty International disputes that Dow has no responsibility to see Union Carbide in court.
produced
- Agent Orange 1965–1970 Primary record 156
involved in
- The 1984 Agent Orange class settlement paid into the fund (with two other makers) Primary record 1
- The Union of India’s curative petition, 2010 to 2023 named as a respondent; Dow says it should not have been Self-published 7
- The contamination of the Bhopal plant site and its water says clean-up lies with the Madhya Pradesh government According to The Dow Chemical Company Self-published 8
- The March 1965 meeting of herbicide makers called the meeting According to U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York Primary record 1
- The French Agent Orange suit defendants, with twelve other firms Scholarship & press 9
- The Vietnamese Agent Orange lawsuit defendants, with other makers Primary record 6
Timeline 3 dates
- 1965–1970 The Dow Chemical Company produced Agent Orange
- 7 May 1984 The Dow Chemical Company settled with U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
- Feb 2001 The Dow Chemical Company acquired Union Carbide Corporation
Proof 9 sources
-
In re Agent Orange Product Liability Litigation, 597 F. Supp. 740 (E.D.N.Y. 1984), MDL No. 381, decided 25 September 1984, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York (Chief Judge Jack B. Weinstein), 25 Sep 1984.
Primary record
Archived copy
defendants have agreed to pay to the class $180 million plus interest in a manner directed by the court.
Neither this Agreement nor any proceeding taken hereunder shall be construed as or deemed to be evidence or an admission or concession by any defendant of any liability or wrongdoing whatsoever, which is expressly denied by each defendant
or on the part of the plaintiffs of any lack of merit in their claims.
The seven chemical company defendants, Dow Chemical Co., Hercules, Inc., The Monsanto Company, Diamond Shamrock Chemicals Corporation, Thompson Chemical Corporation, T.H. Agriculture & Nutrition, and Uniroyal, Inc., manufactured over 99% of a herbicide called Agent Orange
The Fund shall indemnify all defendants
rendered against any of them in all state-court actions alleging harm caused by exposure to Agent Orange in or near Vietnam, not to exceed an aggregate amount of $10 million.
Dow shared this information at a meeting it called in March 1965. Representatives of Hooker Chemical, Hercules, and Diamond Shamrock (then known as Diamond Alkali) were present.
By 1965 Dow knew that in cases of continuous exposure, dioxin could be hazardous in amounts as low as 1 ppm, which was at that time the lowest level at which dioxin could be readily detected.
At the meeting, and on a number of subsequent occasions, Dow and other defendants expressed fear that the government, if it learned of the scope of the problem, might intervene in a way disastrous to the entire herbicide industry.
it could be found that defendants had known for some years before Agent Orange production began in 1965 that factory workers exposed to dioxin in concentrations of tens of parts per million could develop chloracne, liver damage and other diseases.
-
Dow & Bhopal Tragedy, The Dow Chemical Company.
Self-published
UCC became a wholly owned subsidiary of TDCC in February 2001.
-
The Bhopal tragedy: 30 years of injustice for victims and survivors (written statement to the UN Human Rights Council, ASA 20/003/2014), Amnesty International, 17 Feb 2014.
Scholarship & press
In 2001, UCC was bought by The Dow Chemical Company (Dow).
-
Criminal Proceedings (Bhopal), The Dow Chemical Company.
Self-published
the 2001 transaction in which TDCC acquired UCC’s stock resulted in UCC remaining a separate corporate entity responsible for its own debts and obligations.
-
Agent Orange, Dow Inc. (corporate.dow.com).
Self-published
During the war, Dow, Monsanto and other companies were compelled by the U.S. government to produce Agent Orange under the U.S. Defense Production Act of 1950.
-
Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemical Co., 517 F.3d 104 (2d Cir. 2008), No. 05-1953-cv, decided 22 February 2008, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, 22 Feb 2008.
Primary record
Archived copy
This directive essentially commandeered all of the Defendants’ capacity to produce Agent Orange.
manufactured by defendants-appellees United States companies (collectively, “Defendants”) and deployed by the United States military during the Vietnam War.
Defendants also argued that Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring suit, that their claims under the Alien Tort Statute were nonjusticiable under the political question doctrine, and that all of their claims were barred by the government-contractor defense.
-
Government of India Curative Petition, The Dow Chemical Company.
Self-published
the Union of India filed a civil Curative Petition in the India Supreme Court against The Dow Chemical Company (TDCC), Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) and others.
-
Bhopal Site Remediation, The Dow Chemical Company.
Self-published
Responsibility for the clean-up of the Bhopal site lies with the Madhya Pradesh State government.
-
French court rejects claim in landmark Agent Orange lawsuit, Al Jazeera (with Reuters), 10 May 2021.
Scholarship & press
The landmark case, filed in 2014, has pitched Tran To Nga, a 79-year-old, who claims she was a victim of Agent Orange, against 14 firms, including US multinational companies Dow Chemical and Monsanto
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.