Event
The French personal-care price decision (14-D-19, 2014)
On 18 December 2014 the French competition authority fined makers of personal-care products for coordinating their policy towards supermarkets, and their price increases, between 2003 and 2006.
- Dates
- 2003 – 18 Dec 2014
- Family Hands20 scenes
- How are The French personal-care price decision (14-D-19, 2014) and … connected?
Connections 4
involved
- Autorité de la concurrence decided on 18 December 2014 Primary record 1
- L'Oréal fined €189,494,000 on the personal-care market; it contested the decision, and the figure stood after the Paris Court of Appeal’s ruling of 18 June 2020 Primary record 12
- Unilever fined €102,022,000 on the personal-care market and €70,522,000 on home care, under the negotiated settlement procedure Primary record 1
- Procter & Gamble fined €39,109,000 on the personal-care market, €74,923,000 for Gillette and €39,830,000 on home care, under the negotiated settlement procedure Primary record 1
Timeline 1 date
- 2003 – 18 Dec 2014 The French personal-care price decision (14-D-19, 2014)
Proof 2 sources
-
The Autorité de la concurrence fines concerted practices between manufacturers a total of 345,2 € millions and 605,9 € millions on each market concerned (decision 14-D-19), Autorité de la concurrence, 18 Dec 2014.
Primary record
Between 2003 and 2006, on both markets, they coordinated their commercial policy towards supermarkets, and in particular their price increases.
Colgate-Palmolive, Henkel, Unilever, Procter & Gamble, Reckitt Benckiser, Sara Lee, Laboratoires Vendôme, Gillette, L’Oréal, Beiersdorf and Vania participated at varying extents.
Unilever 102 022 000 € - negotiated settlement procedure
Procter & Gamble (Gillette) 74 923 000 € - negotiated settlement procedure
-
Paris Court of Appeal, judgment of 18 June 2020, L’Oréal v. Autorité de la concurrence, on remand from the Cour de cassation (RG 19/08826), Paris Court of Appeal, 18 Jun 2020.
Primary record
INFLIGE, en conséquence, à la société L’Oréal S.A., à titre personnel et en sa qualité d’ayant droit de la société Lascad, une sanction pécuniaire de 189 494 000 euros
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.