Work
Great Leap into Famine
Cormac Ó Gráda's review of Dikötter's Mao's Great Famine, a University College Dublin working paper.
- Dates
- Jan 2011
What it disputes
-
Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62
Rather than engage with the competing assumptions behind these numbers, Dikötter selects Cao Shuji’s estimate of 32.5 million and then adds fifty per cent to it on the basis of discrepancies between archival reports and gazetteer data, thereby generating a minimum total of 45 million excess deaths.
1
Each side is quoted in its own words. Whether a finding holds is not decided here.
Connections 2
disputes a finding of
- Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62 Jan 2011 According to Great Leap into Famine Scholarship & press 1
author
- Cormac Ó Gráda Jan 2011 Scholarship & press 1
Timeline 3 dates
- Jan 2011 Great Leap into Famine
- Jan 2011 Great Leap into Famine disputes a finding of Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62 According to Great Leap into Famine
- Jan 2011 Cormac Ó Gráda authored Great Leap into Famine
Proof 1 source
-
Great Leap into Famine (UCD Centre for Economic Research working paper WP11/03), University College Dublin, Jan 2011.
Scholarship & press
Archived copy
Rather than engage with the competing assumptions behind these numbers, Dikötter selects Cao Shuji’s estimate of 32.5 million and then adds fifty per cent to it on the basis of discrepancies between archival reports and gazetteer data, thereby generating a minimum total of 45 million excess deaths.
Great Leap into Famine
Cormac Ó Gráda, University College Dublin
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.