Connect the Dots

Work

ICJ advisory opinion on Israel's policies and practices (2024)

Opinion of 19 July 2024 on the legal consequences of Israel's policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.

5 links, 5 backed by primary records

Play the story Explore connections

Dates
19 Jul 2024

Connections 5

author

influenced

  • ICJ advisory opinion on the wall (2004) Primary record 2

    Operative votes: presence unlawful 11 to 4; end it as rapidly as possible 11 to 4; cease new settlement and evacuate all settlers 14 to 1; reparation 14 to 1; non-recognition by all States 12 to 3.

  • Settlement, permits and demolitions in the West Bank Primary record 12

    The Court found a breach of Article 3 of the anti-discrimination convention; Judge Iwasawa notes it did not call it apartheid.

  • ICJ advisory opinion on the wall (2004) Primary record 2

    Judges Tomka, Abraham and Aurescu voted against several points, and Vice-President Sebutinde dissented on the ground, in her view, that the proceedings ignored the security threats to Israel.

influenced by

Timeline 2 dates
  1. 19 Jul 2024 ICJ advisory opinion on Israel's policies and practices (2024)
  2. 19 Jul 2024 International Court of Justice authored ICJ advisory opinion on Israel's policies and practices (2024)
Proof 2 sources
  1. Legal Consequences arising from the Policies and Practices of Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, Advisory Opinion, 19 July 2024, International Court of Justice, 19 Jul 2024. Primary record
    By eleven votes to four, Is of the opinion that the State of Israel’s continued presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory is unlawful
    Israel’s legislation and measures constitute breach of Article 3 of CERD
    in its Wall Advisory Opinion as follows
  2. Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024, International Court of Justice, 19 Jul 2024. Primary record
    Israel must immediately cease all new settlement activity.
    all States are under an obligation not to recognize as legal the situation arising from the unlawful presence of Israel
    without qualifying it as apartheid
    Israel’s occupation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory is not unlawful as such
    one-sided
Page history 1 change
  1. Add 55 stories, each checked against its sourcesAlibek96e92fe6

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.