Event

Ruling blocking JetBlue’s purchase of Spirit, 2024

On 16 January 2024 a federal judge ruled that JetBlue’s agreed purchase of Spirit would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and enjoined it. The airlines had argued Spirit was struggling financially and the merged firm would be a stronger rival to the big four; the court said JetBlue was far from the only available purchaser should Spirit fall into dire need. Spirit stopped flying in May 2026.

4 links, 4 backed by primary records

Play the story Explore connections

Dates
16 Jan 2024

On 16 January 2024 a federal judge ruled that JetBlue’s agreed purchase of Spirit would violate Section 7 of the Clayton Act and enjoined it. The airlines had argued Spirit was struggling financially and the merged firm would be a stronger rival to the big four; the court said JetBlue was far from the only available purchaser should Spirit fall into dire need. Spirit stopped flying in May 2026.

Connections 4

involved

Timeline 1 date
  1. 16 Jan 2024 Ruling blocking JetBlue’s purchase of Spirit, 2024
Proof 1 source
  1. United States v. JetBlue Airways Corp. and Spirit Airlines, Inc., Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, No. 23-10511 (D. Mass., 16 January 2024), U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts, 16 Jan 2024. Primary record
    therefore, the Court rules that the proposed acquisition violates Section 7 of the Clayton Act.
    with evidence that Spirit is struggling financially, suggesting that the proposed acquisition would in fact protect consumers from facing a weakened, failing Spirit
    JetBlue is also far from the only available purchaser, should Spirit find itself in dire need.
    These four airlines control 80% of the industry (with the next largest airline, Alaska Airlines, garnering 6% of airline revenue in the United States).
    A post-merger, combined firm of JetBlue and Spirit would likely place stronger competitive pressure on the larger airlines in the country.
    Spirit is a small airline. But there are those who love it.
Page history 3 changes
  1. Second revision of Too Big to Fail: the FTC's 1917 finding, the 1952 report's seven firms, the 1984 hearing record, and corrected cards for Spirit, beef, tickets, Google and the final verdictAlibek05663c47
  2. Revise Too Big to Fail after the skeptic's review: read to 2 November 2026, a verdict card that separates findings from shares, the 1929 fight with its scandal and the board's stand, and sources for every cardAlibekc819f2cb
  3. Add the story Too Big to Fail: Standard Oil's stockholders, the phrase's origin in 1984, and market-by-market cases to November 2026Alibekaa9c434d

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.