Organization
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
J&J subsidiary that made and sold Johnson's Baby Powder; the court records call it JJCI or "Old Consumer".
- Also known as
- JJCI, Old Consumer
What it disputes
-
FDA test of Johnson's Baby Powder, 2019
Additionally, the Company’s investigation revealed that the testing protocol at AMA deviated from standard practice and that AMA did not execute a full asbestos confirmation as required by their lab’s test method.
1
Each side is quoted in its own words. Whether a finding holds is not decided here.
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson
- Decision overturned by Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District: judgment reversed in part for lack of personal jurisdiction over two plaintiffs; punitive damages against JJCI set at $900 million 2
Connections 5
decision overturned by
- Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District 23 Jun 2020 judgment reversed in part for lack of personal jurisdiction over two plaintiffs; punitive damages against JJCI set at $900 million Primary record 2
produced
- Johnson's Baby Powder Primary record 23
involved in
- Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson defendant; the jury found it liable on all claims Primary record 2
part of
- Johnson & Johnson Primary record 2
disputes a finding of
- FDA test of Johnson's Baby Powder, 2019 3 Dec 2019 According to Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. Self-published 1
Timeline 2 dates
- 3 Dec 2019 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. disputes a finding of FDA test of Johnson's Baby Powder, 2019 According to Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
- 23 Jun 2020 Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. decision overturned by Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Proof 3 sources
-
Company Investigation Confirms No Asbestos in Johnson's Baby Powder, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., 3 Dec 2019.
Self-published
Additionally, the Company’s investigation revealed that the testing protocol at AMA deviated from standard practice and that AMA did not execute a full asbestos confirmation as required by their lab’s test method.
Our talc is safe and asbestos free, and these 150-plus tests, and the tests we routinely do to ensure the quality and safety of our talc-based products, are consistent with the results from renowned independent research labs over the past 40 years.
-
Ingham v. Johnson & Johnson, No. ED107476, opinion of the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, 23 Jun 2020.
Primary record
Archived copy
The judgment against JJCI is reversed in part on the claims of the two Non-Resident Plaintiffs
We further enter judgment for $900 million in punitive damages against JJCI and $715,909,091 in punitive damages against J&J.
JJCI manufactures and sells products containing talcum powder (“talc”), a mineral used in cosmetics, across the United States.
The jury awarded each individual Plaintiff $25 million in compensatory damages, totaling $550 million, with judgment entered jointly and severally against Defendants. The jury awarded $4.14 billion in punitive damages, with J&J responsible for $3.15 billion and JJCI responsible for $990 million.
J&J is JJCI’s parent company.
-
In re LTL Management, LLC, Nos. 22-2003 and others, opinion of the Third Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, 30 Jan 2023.
Primary record
So since 1979 only Old Consumer and its predecessors, and not J&J, have directly sold Johnson’s Baby Powder.
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.