Event

Four governments' laws on Native land and labour, 1542 to 1830

The Spanish, British, French and U.S. governments each made law about Native peoples' land and labour, on different terms and dates.

8 links, 5 backed by primary records

Play the story Explore connections

Dates
1542–1830

Connections 8

involved

  • The Spanish Crown prohibited Indian slavery from 1542; colonists disguised the practice Scholarship & press 1
  • British government in 1763 reserved lands "for the use of the said Indians" and forbade purchases and settlements there Primary record 2
  • The colonial administration of New France in 1709 an intendant ordered that purchased "Panis and Negroes" be their buyers' property Scholarship & press 3
  • U.S. Congress in 1830 provided for exchanging lands with Indian nations "as may choose" to remove west of the Mississippi Primary record 45
  • Andrew Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830 Primary record 6

appears in

Timeline 1 date
  1. 1542–1830 Four governments' laws on Native land and labour, 1542 to 1830
Proof 6 sources
  1. The Other Slavery: An Interview with Historian Andres Resendez, History News Network, 8 Jan 2017. Scholarship & press
    Because the Spanish Crown prohibited Indian slavery practically since the beginning of colonization, masters and colonists took pains to disguise their activities and resort to euphemisms and subterfuges.
  2. The Royal Proclamation, 7 October 1763, The Avalon Project, Yale Law School, 7 Oct 1763. Primary record
    We do hereby strictly forbid, on Pain of our Displeasure, all our loving Subjects from making any Purchases or Settlements whatever, or taking Possession of any of the Lands above reserved
    to reserve under our Sovereignty, Protection, and Dominion, for the use of the said Indians, all the Lands and Territories not included within the Limits of Our said Three new Governments
  3. Slavery in New France, Canadian Museum of History, Virtual Museum of New France. Scholarship & press
    All Panis and Negroes who have been purchased and who will be purchased, shall be the property of those who have purchased them and will be their slaves
    Amongst colonists, however, their name rapidly became a generic way of referring to any Aboriginal slave.
    Before 1709, no law protected “the investment” of slave owners.
  4. An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi, United States Statutes at Large, vol. 4, p. 411, 28 May 1830. Primary record
    for the reception of such tribes or nations of Indians as may choose to exchange the lands where they now reside, and remove there
    An Act to provide for an exchange of lands with the Indians residing in any of the states or territories, and for their removal west of the river Mississippi.
  5. Genocide and American Indian History, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History, 2 Mar 2015. Scholarship & press Archived copy
    To secure Indians’ compliance to relocate, the federal government depended on threats.
  6. Analyzing the Petition Against the Treaty of New Echota, National Archives, DocsTeach. Primary record
    Congress passed, and President Andrew Jackson signed, this act which was the first major step in forcibly relocating American Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi River.
Page history 1 change
  1. Add 55 stories, each checked against its sourcesAlibek96e92fe6

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.