Work
Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62
Book by Frank Dikötter, published in 2010, based on Chinese provincial and local archives.
- Dates
- 2010
- The Great Leap20 scenes
- How are Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62 and … connected?
What it found
In all, the records I studied suggest that the Great Leap Forward was responsible for at least 45 million deaths.
1
Who disputes it
-
Great Leap into Famine
Rather than engage with the competing assumptions behind these numbers, Dikötter selects Cao Shuji’s estimate of 32.5 million and then adds fifty per cent to it on the basis of discrepancies between archival reports and gazetteer data, thereby generating a minimum total of 45 million excess deaths.
2
Each side is quoted in its own words. Whether a finding holds is not decided here.
Connections 3
finding disputed by
- Great Leap into Famine Jan 2011 According to Great Leap into Famine Scholarship & press 2
features
- Great Chinese Famine Scholarship & press 12
author
- Frank Dikötter Scholarship & press 2
Timeline 2 dates
- 2010 Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62
- Jan 2011 Great Leap into Famine disputes a finding of Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe, 1958-62 According to Great Leap into Famine
Proof 2 sources
-
Mao's Great Leap to Famine, The New York Times, 16 Dec 2010.
Scholarship & press
Archived copy
In all, the records I studied suggest that the Great Leap Forward was responsible for at least 45 million deaths.
Demographers have used official census figures to estimate that 20 million to 30 million people died.
In the summer of 1962, for instance, the head of the Public Security Bureau in Sichuan sent a long handwritten list of casualties to the local boss, Li Jingquan, informing him that 10.6 million people had died in his province from 1958 to 1961.
-
Great Leap into Famine (UCD Centre for Economic Research working paper WP11/03), University College Dublin, Jan 2011.
Scholarship & press
Archived copy
Rather than engage with the competing assumptions behind these numbers, Dikötter selects Cao Shuji’s estimate of 32.5 million and then adds fifty per cent to it on the basis of discrepancies between archival reports and gazetteer data, thereby generating a minimum total of 45 million excess deaths.
Frank Dikötter’s Mao's Great Famine: The History of China's Most
It is hardly surprising, then, that MGF’s brief account (pp. 324-34) of the famine’s death toll arrives at a figure far beyond the range of between 18 million and 32.5 million proposed hitherto by specialist demographers
Much hinges on what ‘normal’ mortality rates are assumed, since the archives do not distinguish between normal and crisis mortality.
It is highly unlikely that the Communists could have reduced it within less than a decade to the implausibly low 10 per thousand adopted here
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.