Work

Justice Department report on the Epstein agreement (2020)

Report of the Office of Professional Responsibility on how the U.S. Attorney's Office in southern Florida resolved its investigation of Epstein. It found that Acosta's decision “constitutes poor judgment”, found no professional misconduct, and found no evidence that he acted from corruption.

2 links, 2 backed by primary records

Play the story Explore connections

Dates
Nov 2020

Connections 2

parties

Timeline 2 dates
  1. Nov 2020 Justice Department report on the Epstein agreement (2020)
  2. Nov 2020 Office of Professional Responsibility, U.S. Department of Justice party to Justice Department report on the Epstein agreement (2020)
Proof 1 source
  1. Executive Summary of Report: Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006-2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Professional Responsibility, Nov 2020. Primary record
    Investigation into the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida's Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein
    OPR identified former U.S. Attorney Acosta, three former USAO supervisors, and the AUSA as subjects of its investigation
    Nevertheless, OPR concludes that Acosta's decision to resolve the federal investigation through the NPA constitutes poor judgment.
Page history 2 changes
  1. Apply the final reader's report to the four Epstein stories.Alibek7acd804e
  2. Tell the Epstein record in four storiesAlibekde7c5f7a

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.