Event
Release of the “28 pages”, 2016
On 15 July 2016 Congress released the declassified Part Four of its 2002 Joint Inquiry report.
- Dates
- 15 Jul 2016
Connections 3
involved
- U.S. Congress released the pages Scholarship & press 12
- Barack Obama his administration ordered the declassification review Primary record 3
- Government of Saudi Arabia welcomed the release; denies any support Primary record 2456
Timeline 1 date
- 15 Jul 2016 Release of the “28 pages”, 2016
Proof 6 sources
-
ODNI issues statement on declassification of Part Four of HPSCI and SSCI’s 2002 joint inquiry report (statement of 15 July 2016, as published by Intelligence Community News), Intelligence Community News, 17 Jul 2016.
Scholarship & press
Congress has today released additional portions of the Congressional report
Part Four, entitled “Finding, Discussion, and Narrative Regarding Certain Sensitive National Security Matters,” was withheld in full
The newly released portion of Part Four relates to the Joint Inquiry’s finding that “[w]hile in the United States, some of the September 11 hijackers were in contact with, and received support or assistance from, individuals who may be connected to the Saudi Government.”
After a classification review by the Executive Branch, three of the four parts that make up the Joint Inquiry report were publicly released in December 2002.
has made no final determinations as to the reliability or sufficiency of the information regarding these issues
-
Congress’ “28 pages” on Saudi ties to 9/11 released, CBS News, 15 Jul 2016.
Scholarship & press
on the one hand, it is possible that these kinds of connections could suggest, as indicated in a [redacted] dated July 2, 2002, 'incontrovertible evidence that there is support for these terrorists with the Saudi Government.'
On the other hand, it is also possible that further investigation of these allegations could reveal legitimate, and innocent, explanations for these associations.
Kean and Hamilton said the 28 pages were based almost entirely on raw, unvetted material that came to the FBI.
Some critics of the commission's work say the commission failed to run down every Saudi lead
Later investigations found no evidence that the Saudi government or senior Saudi officials knowingly supported those who orchestrated the attacks.
-
Veto Message from the President — S.2040, United States government, 23 Sep 2016.
Primary record
my Administration also directed the Intelligence Community to perform a declassification review of "Part Four of the Joint Congressional Inquiry into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11,"
-
The 9/11 Commission Report: Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, 9-11-commission, 22 Jul 2004.
Primary record
we have found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials individually funded the organization. (This conclusion does not exclude the likelihood that charities with significant Saudi government sponsorship diverted funds to al Qaeda.)
charitable giving was both essential to the culture and subject to very limited oversight.
-
Saudi Arabia Responds to Declassification of the “28 Pages” (statement of the Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia), Government of Saudi Arabia, 15 Jul 2016.
Self-published
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia welcomes the release of the redacted pages from the 2002 Congressional Joint Inquiry.
neither the Saudi government, nor senior Saudi officials, nor any person acting on behalf of the Saudi government provided any support or encouragement for these attacks.
-
Staff Report to the Commission: Monograph on Terrorist Financing, 9-11-commission, 2004.
Primary record
Some individual donors knew of the ultimate destination of their donations, and others did not
the Commission staff has found no persuasive evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or as individual senior officials knowingly support or supported al Qaeda.
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.