Connect the Dots

Work

Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme

Report of 31 March 2010 by the SEC’s Inspector General, in over 150 pages.

3 links, 3 backed by primary records

Play the story Explore connections

Dates
31 Mar 2010
Also known as
OIG-526
The debate

What it found

Our investigation determined that the SEC’s Fort Worth Office was aware since 1997 that Robert Allen Stanford was likely operating a Ponzi scheme1

Connections 3

led to

features

author

Timeline 2 dates
  1. 31 Mar 2010 Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme
  2. 31 Mar 2010 SEC Office of Inspector General authored Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme
Proof 1 source
  1. Oversight of the SEC Inspector General’s Report on the “Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme” and Improving SEC Performance (Senate hearing, S. Hrg. 111-818), U.S. Senate, Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs (via the Government Publishing Office), 22 Sep 2010. Primary record
    Our investigation determined that the SEC’s Fort Worth Office was aware since 1997 that Robert Allen Stanford was likely operating a Ponzi scheme
    OVERSIGHT OF THE SEC INSPECTOR GENERAL’S REPORT ON THE “INVESTIGATION OF THE SEC’S RESPONSE TO CONCERNS REGARDING ROBERT ALLEN STANFORD’S ALLEGED PONZI SCHEME” AND IMPROVING SEC PERFORMANCE
    On March 31, 2010, we issued to the Chairman of the SEC a comprehensive report of our investigation in the Stanford matter
Page history 1 change
  1. Add 55 stories, each checked against its sourcesAlibek96e92fe6

Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.