Organization
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Federal appeals court in Washington, D.C.
- Doubt20 scenes
- The Great Dying30 scenes
- How are U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and … connected?
Connections 4
intervened in
- United States v. Philip Morris USA 22 May 2009 appeals court Primary record 12
overturned a decision about
- Council for Tobacco Research 22 May 2009 judgment vacated as moot, the findings not reviewed; remanded with directions to dismiss Primary record 1
- Tobacco Institute 22 May 2009 judgment vacated as moot, the findings not reviewed; remanded with directions to dismiss Primary record 1
authored
- Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D.C. Cir. 2021) 26 Jan 2021 Primary record 3
Timeline 4 dates
- 22 May 2009 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit intervened in United States v. Philip Morris USA
- 22 May 2009 Council for Tobacco Research decision overturned by U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- 22 May 2009 Tobacco Institute decision overturned by U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
- 26 Jan 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit authored Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (D.C. Cir. 2021)
Proof 3 sources
-
United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., 566 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2009), U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 22 May 2009.
Primary record
we affirm in large part the finding of liability, remanding only for dismissal of the trade organizations.
CTR and TI argue that the district court’s findings relating to the likelihood they will commit future violations render the case against them moot. We agree. The MSA demanded the dissolution of both organizations.
-
United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc., Memorandum Opinion (D.D.C., 22 June 2011), U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (text via govinfo.gov), 22 Jun 2011.
Primary record
cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 3501 (2010).
-
Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, No. 20-5197 (D.C. Cir. 26 January 2021), U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, 26 Jan 2021.
Primary record
We agree with the district court that the Corps acted unlawfully, and we affirm the court’s order vacating the easement while the Corps prepares an environmental impact statement. But we reverse the court’s order to the extent it directed that the pipeline be shut down and emptied of oil.
Page history 1 change
- Add 55 stories, each checked against its sources96e92fe6
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.