Organization
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Federal appeals court for the western states; heard both Epic Games cases.
Decided Epic v. Google (2025) and twice decided Epic v. Apple (2023, 2025).
Connections 2
involved in
- Epic Games v. Apple affirmed contempt in part; sent the commission question back Primary record 1
- Epic Games v. Google affirmed Primary record 2
Proof 2 sources
-
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc., Opinion, No. 25-2935 (9th Cir., 11 December 2025), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 11 Dec 2025.
Primary record
Apple claimed to comply with the injunction, but it instead prohibited App Store developers from using buttons, links, and other calls to action without paying a prohibitive commission to Apple
-
Epic Games, Inc. v. Google LLC (In re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation), Opinion, No. 24-6256 (9th Cir., 31 July 2025), U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 31 Jul 2025.
Primary record
The panel rejected Google’s claim that a decision in Apple’s favor in a lawsuit Epic filed at the same time against Apple precludes Epic from defining the market differently in this case.
Page history 3 changes
- Second revision of Too Big to Fail: the FTC's 1917 finding, the 1952 report's seven firms, the 1984 hearing record, and corrected cards for Spirit, beef, tickets, Google and the final verdict05663c47
- Revise Too Big to Fail after the skeptic's review: read to 2 November 2026, a verdict card that separates findings from shares, the 1929 fight with its scandal and the board's stand, and sources for every cardc819f2cb
- Add the story Too Big to Fail: Standard Oil's stockholders, the phrase's origin in 1984, and market-by-market cases to November 2026aa9c434d
Something wrong or missing? Tell us, with a source, or edit this page.