In 1290 King Edward I told his sheriffs that every Jew in England had until 1 November to leave. That is where this story starts.
This is a history of what power did: kings, parliaments, popes and inquisitors, and the decrees they signed. The reasons the rulers gave were charges and prejudice, and the story quotes them as theirs, next to what historians say drove the decisions. The Encyclopaedia Judaica gives the root of the expulsions as “hatred of the Jew,” which rulers at times exploited for money. Where a charge was false, such as the poisoning of wells or the murder of Christian children, the story says so. Where historians disagree, as on the alleged Soviet deportation plan of 1953, each account gets its say.
A number is going round: Jews expelled from “109 countries.” The Anti-Defamation League says it is shorthand used by antisemites, and the story sets it beside the record. Amsterdam, in this story, is a refuge with limits.
1275
The statute
In about 1275 Edward I forbade Jews in England to lend at interest. His reason was harm to “the good men of his land,” yet in the same sentence he admits that he and his ancestors had “received much benefit” from them. Lending had been pressed on them: the Church condemned interest as a sin, Jews were barred from guilds and from owning farmland, and the crown taxed what they earned. The statute also ordered a yellow badge for everyone over seven and made Jews “taxable to the king and to no other.”
by the usuries (lending money at interest) of Jews made in time past, and that various sins have followed thereafter; [and] although he and his ancestors have received much benefit from the Jewish people in all time past
Statute of the Jewry, about 1275, in the National Archives’ translation: the king’s reason, and his admission. Primary record. Open the source
17 Nov 1278
The charge
On 17 November 1278 all the Jews of England were arrested at once on a charge of clipping coins, and their houses were searched. Christians were accused of the same crime, but the National Archives say the Jews were “targeted as the key suspects.” The crime was punishable by death, and a record shows 269 Jews executed in London by 7 May 1279. The Archives give the toll, not the proof; many families were left poor, and the crown lost the taxes they had paid.
269Jews executed in London by 7 May 1279 on coin-clipping charges, by the record the National Archives cites
Coin-clipping was punishable by death and, by 7th May 1279, it was recorded that 269 Jews had been executed in London.
Jews in England in 1290 (teaching resource with transcribed and translated royal records), The National Archives (UK). Primary record. Open the source
18 Jul 1290
The price
Edward I came home in 1289 deeply in debt, the National Archives says, and offered to expel all Jews in exchange for a tax. Parliament granted £116,000, and on 18 July 1290 he told his sheriffs that every Jew had until 1 November to leave; the crown took their houses. His letter of 5 November gives his charge, that Jews had turned lending into a worse kind, and calls them “perfidious,” meaning faithless. Historians still argue over why; about 3,000 left by the Archives’ estimate, 16,000 by the Encyclopaedia Judaica’s.
To make the tax more bearable Edward essentially offered to expel all Jews in exchange.
The National Archives (UK), on the tax of 1290. Primary record. Open the source
22 Jul 1306
France, 1306
On 21 June 1306 Philip IV secretly ordered every Jew in his kingdom arrested on 22 July, their belongings seized, and then expelled. Before they had left he issued rules for auctioning their houses, and the crown collected the debts owed to them until 1325. The Encyclopaedia Judaica judges that his policy toward the Jews was driven throughout by the crown’s interest. Nine years later Jews were back; in 1323 they were expelled again.
The date had been fixed for July 22 and the secret was so well guarded that not one Jew escaped.
Encyclopaedia Judaica, on the arrests of 22 July 1306. Scholarship & press. Open the source
17 Sep 1394
France, 1394
The last order was given in the name of Charles VI, for whom his uncles had acted as regents since 1392. It told officers to press debtors to repay so the Jews’ pledges could be redeemed, to guard them, and to escort them to the frontier. With 1306, the Encyclopaedia Judaica counts it among the “general expulsions” that kept Jews out of most of France until 1789.
On Sept. 17, 1394, the expulsion of the Jews from France was ordered in Charles' name. Properly speaking, this constituted a refusal on the part of the throne to renew the residence authorization issued by Charles v and which had expired in that year.
Encyclopaedia Judaica, on the ordinance of 17 September 1394. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1182
The “109 countries” count
A number circulates: Jews “expelled from 109 different countries.” The Anti-Defamation League says it probably comes from a list of “109 locations” on an Australian antisemitic website, and that antisemites use it to claim Jews must be “a malicious and harmful people.” That argument treats what rulers, councils and mobs did as proof against the people it was done to. The Encyclopaedia Judaica gives the root of the expulsions as “hatred of the Jew,” which rulers at times exploited for money. In France, Philip Augustus, who needed money, annulled loans to Christians in 1181 and kept a fifth, drove Jews from his own lands in 1182, and readmitted them in 1198. His chronicler repeated a charge of ritual murder; it was false.
Antisemites use this purported figure to claim that Jews must be a malicious and harmful people to have been expelled from so many places; they also use the figure to call for the expulsion of Jews from countries where they currently live.
Anti-Defamation League, on the number 109. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1348
The wells
In 1348 a rumor said Jews had poisoned wells to spread the plague. It was false. Prisoners seized by order of Count Amadeus VI of Savoy were tortured and “confessed,” the records went from town to town, and Jews were burned in at least two hundred places. Pope Clement VI wrote that the charge could not be true, but his commands were little obeyed, especially in Germany.
It cannot be true that the Jews, by such a heinous crime, are the cause or occasion of the plague, because through many parts of the world the same plague, by the hidden judgment of God, has afflicted and afflicts the Jews themselves and many other races who have never lived alongside them.
Pope Clement VI, 1348, in the translation Jewish Currents prints. Scholarship & press. Open the source
14 Feb 1349
Strasbourg, 1349
The council wanted to save the Jews, and a mob led by the butchers’ and tanners’ guilds and by nobles who owed them money overthrew it. By the chronicler’s count about two thousand were burned on 14 February; debts owed to them were cancelled and the new council shared their cash among the working men. Königshofen, writing decades later, blamed the money; the sourcebook’s editor adds that fear and bigotry drove it too. Basel’s council was forced to swear to bar Jews for two hundred years; Strasbourg let them back in 1368.
Thus in this city, at least, it was not merely religious bigotry and fear of the plague, but economic resentment that fired the craftsmen and the nobles to their work of extermination.
The sourcebook’s editor, on Strasbourg. Primary record. Open the source
1483
The Inquisition
In 1478 a papal bull let Ferdinand and Isabella name inquisitors, to try converts accused of secretly keeping their old faith. Complaints that the two inquisitors at Seville were cruel reached Pope Sixtus IV, and in 1482 he wrote to the monarchs of his dissatisfaction. In October 1483 Torquemada was named inquisitor-general.
The two inquisitors at Seville were so cruel that complaints were made to Sixtus IV.
The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1906, on the Inquisition at Seville. Scholarship & press. Open the source
31 Mar 1492
The Alhambra Decree
The monarchs charged that contact with Jews drew converts back to their old faith; their proof was “many statements and confessions” gathered by the crown’s own inquisition. A reference article says most scholars read it instead as anxiety about converts, or as pressure to convert. Every Jew had until the end of July to leave, on pain of death and confiscation, and could not take out gold, silver or coin. Faith or home: Henry Kamen reckons at most 70,000 Jews in Castile and 10,000 in Aragon, and most, the best evidence suggests, converted; estimates of those who left run from 40,000 to hundreds of thousands.
under pain that if they do not perform and comply with this command and should be found in our said kingdom and lordships and should in any manner live in them, they incur the penalty of death and the confiscation of all their possessions by our Chamber of Finance
The Alhambra Decree, Granada, 31 March 1492 (translation by Edward Peters). Primary record. Open the source
4 Dec 1496
Portugal, 1496
Most of Spain’s exiles had crossed into Portugal. When King Manuel sought the daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella, they demanded that he expel Portugal’s Jews. His edict of 4 December 1496 (5 December in some accounts) gave them eleven months to leave, on pain of death.
But in 1496 the king entered a politically motivated marriage with Princess Isabella of Spain, daughter of Ferdinand and Isabella, who made their consent conditional to Manuel's ridding Portugal of the Jews.
Encyclopaedia Judaica, on Manuel I. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1497
Lisbon, 1497
The Encyclopaedia Judaica says Manuel saw that losing so many subjects would cost Portugal dearly; another account says conversion came first. He ordered them to gather at Lisbon, supposedly to embark, and had some 20,000 baptized by force. In 1506 a Lisbon mob killed some 4,000 converts, and Manuel had the friars who incited it executed.
About 20,000People gathered at Lisbon and forcibly converted in 1497, by the Encyclopaedia Judaica
When some 20,000 had convened in Lisbon, Manuel herded them together for forced conversion.
Manuel I (Encyclopaedia Judaica), Encyclopaedia Judaica, via Encyclopedia.com. Scholarship & press. Open the source
c. 1492
The Ottoman Empire
Many exiles settled in Ottoman towns in the Balkans and Anatolia, and the chronicler Elijah Capsali says Sultan Bayezid II ordered his governors to receive them kindly. A reference article adds that the economic cost to Spain, once thought great, now seems relatively minor. The Encyclopaedia Judaica also records forced conversions in his reign and that he enforced the ban on new synagogues.
According to R. Elijah Capsali, Sultan Bayazid issued an order to the governors of the provinces not to refuse those Jews entry or cause them difficulties but to receive them cordially and provide them with the help they needed to settle themselves.
Encyclopaedia Judaica, citing the chronicler Elijah Capsali. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1264
Poland
After the Mongol invasions of 1241 Polish princes wanted settlers from the west. In 1264 Duke Boleslaus the Pious of Kalisz issued a charter, modelled on one from Austria, that saw Jews as protected lenders; Casimir III confirmed and widened it. The Encyclopaedia Judaica says Polish Jews spread into almost every branch of trade, which it holds contradicts the antisemitic myth of a “Jewish spirit of usury.” It was no refuge without limits: town and church pressed the badge, and Lithuania expelled its Jews for a short time in 1495.
Subsequently, the princes of Poland eagerly sought immigrants from the west, mainly from Germany, and gave them energetic assistance to settle in the villages and towns.
Encyclopaedia Judaica, on Poland after the Mongol invasions. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1543
A reformer asks the rulers
Ninety-Five Theses told how Luther’s church began. In 1543 he wrote On the Jews and Their Lies, advising the authorities to take seven steps, among them burning synagogues and razing houses. The Lutheran scholar Gerhard Forde reports that Luther added: if they would not, Jews should be exiled. In 1994 the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America rejected that “violent invective.”
Later, he avers that if the authorities are not willing to do this, Jews should be exiled from the country.
Gerhard Forde, on Luther’s treatise of 1543. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1598
Amsterdam
Amsterdam, in this story, is a refuge with limits, not the Netherlands as a whole: in 1444 Utrecht’s council ordered Jews tortured, imprisoned and expelled. Exiles from Portugal began to arrive in Amsterdam from about 1593; the city’s oldest record of them, probably, is dated 28 November 1598. The Union of Utrecht of 1579 had forbidden persecution on religious grounds, but its supporters were rarely clear whether that covered non-Christians. From 1619 each town set its own rules, and in 1632 Amsterdam denied Jews the full rights of burghers.
They were never officially denied (or granted) freedom of worship.
Miriam Bodian, historian, on the Portuguese Jews of Amsterdam. Scholarship & press. Open the source
Dec 1655
England again
In December 1655 Cromwell called a conference at Whitehall on whether Jews could return. It ended without a definite conclusion: merchants and clergy opposed readmission, though some delegates argued that Jewish trading networks would lower the price of imports. Hessayon writes that Cromwell, like some delegates, may have hoped for conversions. The National Archives dates his permission to 1656.
The Whitehall Conference had ended without a definite conclusion.
Ariel Hessayon, historian, on the conference of December 1655. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1791–1917
The Pale
Russia had barred Jews since the end of the 15th century. After Poland’s partitions it ruled masses of them, so in 1791 the law fixed where they might live and barred them from trading in inner Russia. The May Laws of May 1882 forbade Jews to settle outside towns; the Encyclopaedia Judaica says they met the demands of rural merchants who wanted rid of Jewish rivals. In 1891–92 thousands of craftsmen were expelled from Moscow. About 4.9 million Jews lived in the Pale in 1897, some 11.6% of its people; the provisional government ended it in 1917.
These decrees were intended to serve the national and economic interests of the state by preventing competition of the Jewish with Russian merchants and encouraging settlement in the desolate steppes of southern Russia
Encyclopaedia Judaica, on the Russian decrees of 1791 and 1794. Scholarship & press. Open the source
13 Jan 1953
The Doctors’ Plot
The Encyclopaedia Judaica calls it the most dramatic anti-Jewish episode in the Soviet Union under Stalin. On 13 January 1953 the Soviet press announced the arrest of doctors said to have confessed to murdering two Soviet leaders, and falsely tied them to a Jewish aid organization in the U.S.; one of the doctors, Yakov Etinger, died under torture. Stalin died on 5 March, and on 3 April Pravda said the doctors were not guilty and that “impermissible means of investigation” had been used. The encyclopedia reads the Plot as apparently part of a plan for a new purge of Stalin’s own leadership.
On January 13, 1953, Pravda and Radio Moscow announced that nine eminent doctors were under arrest and had confessed to murdering two Soviet leaders of the past, A.S. Shcherbakov and A.A. Zhdanov
Encyclopaedia Judaica, reporting the announcement of 13 January 1953: the state’s charge. Scholarship & press. Open the source
1953
An alleged plan
Did Stalin mean to follow the Plot by deporting about two million Soviet Jews to Siberia and Central Asia? Most Soviet-era Western scholars took it as fact, Oleg Ivanov writes, citing memoirs and insiders such as the doctor’s adopted son, also named Yakov Etinger, who said Nikolai Bulganin told him of orders to gather cattle cars in February 1953. Gennady Kostyrchenko finds no credible evidence and calls it a “Cold War legend”; David Brandenberger, Jonathan Brent and others say the question must stay unresolved. No archival document has been found.
The dearth of archival material confirming Stalin’s alleged Jewish deportation plan has prevented a consensus regarding its existence from forming.
Oleg Ivanov, UCLA doctoral dissertation in comparative literature, 2021, summing up the debate. Scholarship & press. Open the source