The Red Rubber

From 1885 to 1908 the Congo Free State was ruled by King Leopold II as its sovereign, not by Belgium; Belgium took it over on 15 November 1908.

Rubber was gathered by the State’s own agents and soldiers and by concession companies in which the State held shares. Belgians administered it, and most staff and practices stayed after 1908.

This story keeps four things apart: what the record shows, what a named body found, what the State and its defenders said in answer, and what is only alleged. The British consul Roger Casement, the Free State’s own Commission of Inquiry, the campaigners and the Belgian Chamber’s experts of 2024 found different things, and each is given in its own words. Congolese villagers speak where the record holds their words, often as letters, because the printed names were withheld. Nobody has an exact count of the dead; the later scenes give the ranges and who made them. Some sources are in French; the narration translates them. There are no pictures: the story tells what happened without showing it.

12 Sep 1876

A crusade

On 12 September 1876 King Leopold II of the Belgians opened a conference of geographers in the royal palace at Brussels. Delegates came from Britain, Germany, France, Austria, Russia, Italy and Belgium. He called the opening of Africa to civilisation “a crusade worthy of this century of progress.” His invitation had spoken of abolishing slavery in Africa. The text comes from Henry Wellington Wack, a New York lawyer whose 1905 book defends the Free State.

To open to civilisation the only part of the globe where it has not yet penetrated, to pierce the darkness enshrouding entire populations, that is, if I may venture to say so, a crusade worthy of this century of progress
King Leopold II, opening the Brussels Geographic Conference, 1876, in Wack's translation. Scholarship & press. Open the source

1884

The King’s expeditions

Wack writes that paying the explorers and equipping the stations drew on Leopold’s private fortune. Henry Morton Stanley worked “in the King’s name” and made treaties with chiefs; Wack counts over five hundred. What those treaties meant to the chiefs who made them is not in these records. Leopold’s own counsel later told the U.S. President that Wack “has given us the truth.”

Stanley the man was working in the interests of King Leopold, travelling through the Congo country, buying land here and there, establishing stations, and making treaties in the King’s name with native chiefs.
Henry Wellington Wack, The Story of the Congo Free State, 1905. Scholarship & press. Open the source

26 Feb 1885

Berlin

On 22 April 1884 the U.S. government recognised the Association’s flag as that of a friendly government. On 15 November Bismarck’s conference of fourteen states opened in Berlin. Its Act, signed on 26 February 1885, bound the powers in the region “to watch over the preservation of the native tribes.” The Association was not a signer; the powers signed separate conventions recognising it, and it adhered to the Berlin resolutions on 25 February 1885, Wack writes. In 2024 the Belgian Chamber’s experts wrote that the Free State’s practices appear plainly contrary to Article 6.

All the Powers exercising sovereign rights or influence in the aforesaid territories bind themselves to watch over the preservation of the native tribes, and to care for the improvement of the conditions of their moral and material well-being
General Act of the Berlin Conference, Article 6, 1885. Primary record. Open the source

5 Aug 1889

His own

On 28 April 1885 Belgium’s Chamber authorised Leopold to be chief of the new State, with one vote against, and said the union between Belgium and the State would be “exclusively personal.” He ruled it as its sovereign, not as Belgium’s government. Yet in 1889 Leopold himself wrote that the State was “directed from Brussels” and that “Belgians administer it.” The Belgian experts of 2024 add that Belgium’s support was indirect: seconded officers, loans and shareholdings.

A young and vast State, directed from Brussels, has peacefully taken its place under the sun, thanks to the benevolent aid of the Powers which have applauded its beginning. Belgians administer it
King Leopold II to his minister Beernaert, 5 August 1889, in Wack. Scholarship & press. Open the source

17 Sep 1903

What the State told the powers

In its note of 17 September 1903, answering a British circular of 8 August, the Free State said its rubber exports had been “hardly 30 tons” in 1887 and were now about 5,000 tons a year, sold at Antwerp. It said that “acts of violence have been committed against the natives in the Congo, as everywhere else in Africa,” that guilty officials were punished, and that such cases were “the exception.” These are the State’s own claims. The Belgian experts write that data on how much Leopold personally gained remain imprecise.

30 to 5,000 tonsRubber exported from the Congo, 1887 and about 1903, by the Free State's own account

while formerly, in 1887, for instance, the rubber export amounted to hardly 30 tons.
Correspondence and Report from His Majesty's Consul at Boma respecting the Administration of the Independent State of the Congo (Africa No. 1, 1904), with the Congo State's note of 17 September 1903 and its annexes, Parliament of the United Kingdom, Accounts and Papers 1904 (Internet Archive copy), Feb 1904. Primary record. Open the source

1905

Domain and concessions

The State declared “vacant lands” its own on 1 July 1885. The rubber was then gathered by State agents on the State’s domain, including what the Commission calls the Crown Domain exploited by State agents, and by concession companies such as Abir, in which the State often held half the stock. Casement wrote that no one he met denied armed men, in company pay or State service, had been widely used to enforce the demands. The Belgian experts say the State was sometimes the majority shareholder, a tangle of public and private interests. The Commission of Inquiry wrote that the companies had “profits and not civilisation or humanitarian ends” in view.

In exchange for the right of exploitation which it concedes, the State receives a considerable part (often the half) of the stock of the company.
Commission of Inquiry of the Congo Free State, 1905. Primary record. Open the source

1905

Forced labour

A decree of 18 November 1903 set forty hours a month and let the Governor General empower company agents to collect it. The State’s Commission wrote that compulsion had been needed to make people gather rubber, that the amount for each gatherer varied, from 9 kilos in Mongalla to 6 in Abir, and that the time gathering rubber took was a “flagrant violation” of the forty hours. Agents had once received premiums on what they collected; the Commission said those were stopped about ten years before.

all of these circumstances have made compulsion necessary to induce the native to gather rubber
Commission of Inquiry of the Congo Free State, 1905. Primary record. Open the source

5 Jun 1903

The consul

Former State employees and Protestant missionaries had spoken out since the 1880s, the experts write. In 1903 the British consul at Boma, Roger Casement, went up the river for two and a half months. The State called his visits “rapid and hasty.” He wrote that around Lake Mantumba the fall in population and the empty villages were due “above all else” to years of effort to compel people to work rubber. He gave sleeping sickness a prominent place, but a lesser one.

5,000 to 600People at Lukolela, 1887 and 1903, in Casement's account

This district had, when I visited it in 1887, numbered fully 5,000 people; to-day the population is given, after a careful enumeration, at less than 600.
Correspondence and Report from His Majesty's Consul at Boma respecting the Administration of the Independent State of the Congo (Africa No. 1, 1904), with the Congo State's note of 17 September 1903 and its annexes, Parliament of the United Kingdom, Accounts and Papers 1904 (Internet Archive copy), Feb 1904. Primary record. Open the source

Jul 1903

The refugees

In July 1903 Casement questioned people who had fled from the Crown Domain district to the country of their neighbours. In the Blue Book their names are letters. One said: “we were killed and starved.” Another said the soldiers told them “you are nyama (meat)” and killed those whose rubber was short; another said, “We are killed by the work you make us do.” Casement wrote: “Doubtless they exaggerated the numbers, but they were clearly telling what they knew and loathed.”

We fled because we could not endure the things done to us. Our Chiefs were hanged, and we were killed and starved and worked beyond endurance to get rubber.
Refugees questioned by Roger Casement, July 1903, as he recorded it. Primary record. Open the source

1903

Soldiers and hands

Around Lake Mantumba Casement saw two people whose hands had been cut off, one a boy of eleven or twelve. In both cases, he wrote, Government soldiers had been with white officers whose names he was given. A post chief told him men still came whose hands had been cut off by Government soldiers. Casement also copied a diary entry of a man he does not name: a corporal sent for rubber had to bring back a hand for every cartridge used. He gave it as one man’s account.

In both these cases the Government soldiers had been accompanied by white officers whose names were given to me.
Roger Casement, report of 11 December 1903. Primary record. Open the source

1903

Women held

On the Lulongo, in the district of the La Lulanga Company, Casement found sentries guarding fifteen women, five with infants at the breast. For eleven, the chief sentry said he had caught them so their husbands would bring in rubber. “At nightfall,” Casement wrote, “the fifteen women in the shed were tied together, either neck to neck or ankle to ankle.” La Lulanga was a company; the soldiers of the last scene served the State.

if I caught and kept the men, who would work the rubber? But if I catch their wives, the husbands are anxious to have them home again, and so the rubber is brought in quickly and quite up to the mark.
A sentry of the La Lulanga Company, as Roger Casement wrote it down, 1903. Primary record. Open the source

Nov 1904

Twigs and sticks

The chief Lontulu of Bolima came to the Commission’s hearing with 110 twigs, each one a life lost for rubber, in the missionaries’ notes that Doyle prints; Doyle writes that the Commission’s evidence was never published. At Baringa chiefs brought the Commission bunches of sticks, one for each person a sentry had killed; one chief said 120 in his village. The Commission added: “Whatever one may think of the amount of confidence that should be placed in a record of this sort.”

He brought with him one hundred and ten twigs, each of which represented a life sacrificed for rubber.
Missionaries' notes of Lontulu's testimony, printed in Arthur Conan Doyle, The Crime of the Congo, 1909. Scholarship & press. Open the source

13 Mar 1904

The State’s rejoinder

On 13 March 1904 the Free State answered Casement’s report and asked for “the full Report, including names, dates, and places referred to.” It called the case of Epondo, a boy whose hand was cut off, a plot by villagers who wanted to avoid work; the Commission later said a medical examination convinced it that a wild animal took his hand. Casement had written that the village men declared they saw a La Lulanga sentry do it. The Commission nonetheless confirmed other mutilated people. Leopold’s counsel wrote in 1905 that departures from the State’s principles came from “the infirmities of the human instruments it has employed.”

a desire to be placed in possession of the full Report, including names, dates, and places referred to
British minister at Brussels, 13 March 1904, on the Congo Government's rejoinder. Primary record. Open the source

Apr 1904

An association

The Congo Reform Association was formed in Britain in April 1904, with Earl Beauchamp as president. The Belgian experts write that Casement and Morel, an Elder Dempster shipping employee, co-founded it. Morel says the idea was his and describes the odds he faced. The experts also write that the Free State secretly set up a press bureau that paid journalists at home and abroad to present it well. Morel says critics called him the agent of “a syndicate of rubber merchants”; Doyle says the charge grew from his Liverpool shipping work.

We had against us a King who was a multi-millionaire
E. D. Morel, Red Rubber, 1906 (Morel's own account). Scholarship & press. Open the source

5 Oct 1904

The Commission

On 23 July 1904 the Free State appointed a Commission of Inquiry: Edmond Janssens, Giacomo Nisco and E. de Schumacher. The Belgian experts of 2024 write that Leopold named the members himself and personally commented on the draft report, intending to soften some conclusions, and that it was mainly a chance to refute Casement. Doyle notes that Nisco was a Congo functionary himself. It left Antwerp on 15 September 1904 and sat at Boma, Leopoldville, Coquilhatville and in Abir’s district. The U.S. minister at Brussels judged a pamphlet summary of its report to be “made in a spirit of perfect fairness.” The experts’ verdict on the King: he did not order the abuses and archives show orders to stop them, but his repeated calls for profit kept the brutality going and he bears undeniable responsibility.

See if, in certain parts of the territory, the natives were subjected to ill treatment either by private individuals or by State Agents
The Commission's mandate, as quoted in its report, 1905. Primary record. Open the source

30 Oct 1905

What it confirmed

The Commission, which the King had named, reported on 30 October 1905 that punitive expeditions ordered to “punish or chastise” a village were often murderous; that in company raids “men have been killed as well as women and children, often even when they were fleeing”; that at Abir posts the lash and the imprisonment of women as hostages were habitual and never denied; and that the sentry system should be suppressed. Holding women hostage, it wrote, “outrages our notion of justice.” It said it could not say how many abuses sentries committed. But the essential charges “seem to be established,” and no agent tried to refute them.

it is very hard to keep the expedition from assuming the character of a massacre accompanied by pillage and the destruction of property
Commission of Inquiry of the Congo Free State, 1905. Primary record. Open the source

7 Mar 2024

What it left out

The Commission confirmed that living people were mutilated by soldiers or sentries who took them for dead, among them Imponge, a boy of about fifteen, and Boali. But it found that mutilation “never had the character of torture inflicted voluntarily and knowingly” and wrote that cutting the dead was an old custom. Of the people it heard it wrote that “the black of the Congo has not the same notion of truth that we have,” adding that it did not mean he was a liar. The 2024 experts say the report adopts a racist view, presents the mutilations as customary and passes over 258 Congolese testimonies of prison, severed hands and massacres. It chose, they write, to bury those voices for decades.

We cannot think of transcribing in this report the hundreds of depositions that we have collected, or even make an abstract of them.
Commission of Inquiry of the Congo Free State, 1905. Primary record. Open the source

15 Nov 1908

Belgium’s

On 23 January 1908 the U.S. and British ministers told Belgium’s foreign minister that their governments reserved their position on annexation, the U.S. on the humanitarian terms of the Berlin Act and the Brussels Act of 1890. In August 1908 Belgium’s Chamber adopted the treaty and a colonial law giving the colony “a legal status distinct from that of the mother country.” The law was published on 20 October. Belgium assumed sovereignty on 15 November 1908. The law changed; the experts write that most staff and practices stayed, forced labour was banned but not ended, and the Force publique and the chicotte whip remained.

has fixed on the 15th of this month as the date on which the Government of the King will assume the exercise of sovereignty in its colonial possessions
Belgian foreign minister Davignon, note of 6 November 1908. Primary record. Open the source

1909

In print

Mark Twain’s “King Leopold’s Soliloquy” (Boston, 1905) is a satire in the King’s voice. Its title page quotes a Belgian professor, Félicien Cattier, calling Leopold “the absolute Master” of the State. Arthur Conan Doyle’s “The Crime of the Congo” came in 1909, after Belgium took over. Doyle listed what the State’s defenders said, among them that the agitation was “a plot of the Liverpool merchants,” and answered each. He prints, undated, a sentence he gives to the King: the horrors “give way little by little before our intervention.”

Leopold II is the absolute Master of the whole of the internal and external activity of the Independent State of the Congo.
Félicien Cattier, Brussels University, quoted on the title page of Twain's pamphlet, 1905. Scholarship & press. Open the source

7 Mar 2024

How many

No one has an exact count. The highest figure is ten million deaths, which the Belgian experts trace to Adam Hochschild (1998); another reading, from authors the experts do not name, is no net fall given migration. The experts find it impossible to deny that deaths rose, from violence, fewer births and disease among people driven from their land.

Up to 10 millionDeaths some experts say the early rule left, as Africanews reports it (the Belgian experts name Adam Hochschild; other readings are lower)

His early rule, starting in 1885, was famous for its brutality, which some experts say left as many as 10 million people dead.
Belgian king 'deeply regrets' colonial injustices in DR Congo (Associated Press report), Africanews, 30 Jun 2020. Scholarship & press. Open the source

7 Mar 2024

Sanderson’s estimate

The demographer Jean-Paul Sanderson works back from 10 million people in 1935, using surveys and administrative counts. He calls 20 million in 1885 highly improbable, 15 million far likelier, 11.5 million conceivable. By subtraction that is a fall of 1.5 to 5 million people over fifty years, 27 of them under Belgium: a fall, not a death toll. The 1905 Commission wrote of “the absence of a census” and said that, if Stanley is accepted, “a large part of the population has disappeared.” The experts say the lack of exact figures casts no doubt on the decline nor on the massive scale of the violence. On genocide they find intent cannot be shown, since the rulers needed labour, and warn that the word must not hide the regime’s inherently violent nature.

30 Jun 2020

Regrets

On 30 June 2020 King Philippe wrote to Congo’s president that “acts of violence and cruelty were committed” at the time of the Independent State of the Congo, and expressed his regrets. He did not mention Leopold II by name, and the prime minister said he spoke in a personal capacity. He repeated the regrets in Kinshasa in 2022. It was no apology. The Chamber’s special commission, set up in July 2020, could not agree on an official apology at the end of 2022: JusticeInfo reports that liberal and Christian Democrat members refused to vote for the final report, fearing reparations. Belgium has apologised for Lumumba’s murder (2002) and for the injustices done to the métis (2019). The latest records read here, a 2023 report and the experts’ findings of March 2024, record no apology adopted by the Chamber for the Free State or for colonial rule.

At the time of the independent State of the Congo, acts of violence and cruelty were committed that still weigh on our collective memory
King Philippe of the Belgians, letter of 30 June 2020. Scholarship & press. Open the source