Back to Who benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?
Who benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?
Shows who gained or lost, and who disputes a study that says so, in the words of whoever says it. Not that anyone caused it.
A connection is not evidence of wrongdoing.
3 Mar 1918
Who benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk?
Shows who gained or lost, and who disputes a study that says so, in the words of whoever says it. Not that anyone caused it.
According to Erich Ludendorff. The Imperial German government benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
According to Grigori Sokolnikov. Turkey benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
Said for the Soviet delegation at the final session on 3 March 1918, before signing. Turkey here is the Ottoman Empire, one of the four Central Powers that signed. Article IV of the treaty had Russian troops leave Ardahan, Kars and Batum.
According to Paul von Hindenburg. The Imperial German government benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
From the 1920 memoirs of the Chief of the German General Staff. He goes on: ‘a broad forward zone was created against Russia on the far side of our frontiers.’
According to Vladimir Lenin. Russia benefited from the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
The peace is the Brest-Litovsk treaty: the next paragraph cites the congress resolution of 15 March 1918 that ratified it.
Russia, harmed by the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk.
Written on 11 March 1918, between the signing and the ratification. ‘He’ is the ‘imperialist plunderer’ of the sentence before (Germany); ‘us’ is Soviet Russia.
Named in 2 of the 4 accounts recorded here (Gained): the Imperial German government.
Shows who gained or lost, and who disputes a study that says so, in the words of whoever says it. Not that anyone caused it.
A connection is not evidence of wrongdoing.
Drawn from the sourced links on its answer page. Change a link and this story changes with it.